Land Cover Classification System Classification Concepts And User Manual

 admin

Land cover surrounding Madison, WI. Fields are colored yellow and brown, water is colored blue, and urban surfaces are colored red.

Land cover is the physical material at the surface of the earth. Land covers include grass, asphalt, trees, bare ground, water, etc. Earth cover is the expression used by ecologist Frederick Edward Clements that has its closest modern equivalent being vegetation.[1]:52 The expression continues to be used by the United States Bureau of Land Management.[2]

  1. Land Cover Classification System (LCCS): Classification Concepts and User Manual. Di Gregorio, A., and Jansen, L.J.M. Environment and Natural Resources Service, GCP/RAF/287/ITA Africover - East Africa Project and Soil Resources, Management and Conservation Service. 157pages, 28 figures and 3 tables.
  2. Academia.edu is a platform for academics to share research papers.
  3. Copenhagen, 4 October 2010. Land cover classification in the revised SEEA. Outcome paper (draft for discussion) Jean-Louis Weber, EEA. Land cover accounts and land classification have been addressed in the 13th London Group meeting in Brussels, 2008 which has concluded in the need for two position papers to be prepared, on land use and land cover classification.

There are two primary methods for capturing information on land cover: field survey and analysis of remotely sensed imagery. Land change models can be built from these types of data to assess future shifts in land cover

One of the major land cover issues (as with all natural resource inventories) is that every survey defines similarly named categories in different ways. For instance, there are many definitions of 'forest'—sometimes within the same organisation—that may or may not incorporate a number of different forest features (e.g., stand height, canopy cover, strip width, inclusion of grasses, and rates of growth for timber production). Areas without trees may be classified as forest cover 'if the intention is to re-plant' (UK and Ireland), while areas with many trees may not be labelled as forest 'if the trees are not growing fast enough' (Norway and Finland).

Dec 26, 2007  Land change science has emerged as a fundamental component of global environmental change and sustainability research. This interdisciplinary field seeks to understand the dynamics of land cover and land use as a coupled human–environment system to address theory, concepts, models, and applications relevant to environmental and societal problems, including the intersection of the two. A Land-Use/Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensing Data, U.S.G.S. Professional Paper 964). Before expanding upon the Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, it may prove beneficial to the reader if the. The user of this manual should be aware of the fact that the.

Distinction from 'land use'[edit]

'Land cover' is distinct from 'land use', despite the two terms often being used interchangeably. Land use is a description of how people utilize the land and of socio-economic activity. Urban and agricultural land uses are two of the most commonly known land use classes. At any one point or place, there may be multiple and alternate land uses, the specification of which may have a political dimension. The origins of the 'land cover/land use' couplet and the implications of their confusion are discussed in Fisher et al. (2005).[3]

Cover

Types[edit]

Land cover by IGBP with 17 classes. Class definition[4] Color Code[5]
EvergreenNeedleleafForest
Deciduous Needleleaf Forest
Mixed Forest
Open Shrubland
Savannas
Permanent Wetlands
Urban and Built-Up
Snow and Ice

Following table is Land Cover statistics by Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) with 14 classes.

Land Cover[6][7] (million ha = 10 000 km2)
FAO codetype[8]199220012015sharechange fm 92note
[6970]Artificial surfaces (including urban and associated areas)26.0434.3355.400.37%29.35
[6971]Herbaceous crops1,716.221,749.581,712.1511.50%-4.06Arable land
[6972]Woody crops162.86181.32199.901.34%37.04Arable land
[6973]Multiple or layered cropsArable land
[6974]Tree-covered areas4,434.924,393.704,335.0029.11%-99.93large decrease
[6975]Mangroves18.0618.3918.740.13%0.67
[6976]Shrub-covered areas1,685.001,669.651,627.3410.93%-57.66large decrease
[6977]Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation, aquatic or regularly flooded202.61194.77185.391.24%-17.23
[6978]Sparsely natural vegetated areas891.78878.69868.075.83%-23.71
[6979]Terrestrial barren land2,001.252,000.871,884.0012.65%-117.25large decrease
[6980]Permanent snow and glaciers78.5984.3284.290.57%5.70
[6981]Inland water bodies432.60435.00444.572.98%11.97
[6982]Coastal water bodies and intertidal areas
[6983]Grassland1,793.651,806.501,801.1412.09%7.50
Total Land Mass14,893.91100%

See also[edit]

External links[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^Makers of American Botany, Harry Baker Humphrey, Ronald Press Company, Library of Congress Card Number 61-18435
  2. ^'Susitna MOA Earth Cover Classification'(PDF). BlM-Alaska Technical Report 44. Bureau of Land Management. September 2002. Archived from the original(PDF) on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 15 June 2015.
  3. ^Fisher, 2005.
  4. ^The IGBP Land Cover Classification
  5. ^
  6. ^
  7. ^values are from CCI_LC（Climate Change Initiative Land Cover） by European Space Agency
  8. ^FAO Dataset Information: Land Cover Title Abstract Supplemental see Table 1. SEEA CF/AFF land cover classes and corresponding LCC classifiers, page 2,3,4

Land Cover Classification System (lccs) Classification Concepts And User Manual

References[edit]

Land Cover Classification System Classification Concepts And User Manual Software Version (2)

Concepts
  • Lex Comber; et al. (2005). 'What Is Land Cover?'. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design (32): 199–209.External link in |title= (help)
  • Di Gregorio, Antonio; Jansen, Louisa J.M. (2000). 'Land Cover Classification System: Classification Concepts and User Manual'. Food and Agriculture Organization.
  • Pete Fisher; et al. (2005). 'Land use and Land cover: Contradiction or Complement'. In Peter Fisher, David Unwin (ed.). Re-Presenting GIS. Chichester: Wiley. pp. 85–98.
  • Ivan Balenovic; et al. (2015). 'Quality assessment of high density digital surface model over different land cover classes'.PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM. VOL. 117, No 4, pp. 459–470, 2015
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Land_cover&oldid=920235574'
  1. Anderson J.R., Hardy E.E., Roach J.T., 1972, A land-use classification system for use with remote sensor data. US Geological Survey Circular 671, Washington DC, USA, p. 16.Google Scholar
  2. Di Gregorio A., Jansen L.J.M., 2000, Land Cover Classification System (LCCS). Classification Concepts and User Manual. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy, pp. 80+99 of appendices.Google Scholar
  3. Heymann Y., Steenmans Ch., Croissille G., Bossard M., 1994, CORINE Land Cover. Technical Guide. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, EUR12585 EN, Luxembourg, p. 137.Google Scholar
  4. Lambin E.F., Baulies X., Bockstael N., Fischer G., Krug Leemans T.R., Moran E.F., Rindfuss R.R., Sato Y., Skole D., Turner B.L. II, Vogel C. 1999, Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC). Implementation Strategy (IGBP Report 48, IHDP Report 10). IGBP and IHDP Secretariats, Stockholm, Bonn, p. 125.Google Scholar

Bibliography

  1. Alberts J., Tauch R., 1994, Mapping from space - cartographic applications of satellite image data. GeoJournal, 32(l): 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belward A.S., 1996, The IGBP-DIS Global 1-Km Land Cover Data Set (DISCover): Proposal and Implementation Plans Toulouse, France, A.S. Belward (Ed.) IGBP-DIS, Toulouse, Fran Working Paper No. 13, p. 61.Google Scholar
  3. Belward A.S., Estes J.E, Kline K.D., 1999, The IGDB-DIS global 1 km land cover data set DISCover: a project overview. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 65(9): 1013–1020.Google Scholar
  4. Bossard M., Feranec J., Otahel J., 2000, CORINE land cover-technical guide – Addendum 2000, European Environment Agency, Technical report n. 40.Google Scholar
  5. Büttner G. et al., 1998, The European CORINE Land Cover Database, ISPRS Commission VII Symposium, Budapest, September 1–4, 1998, Proceedings, pp. 633–638.Google Scholar
  6. Chodota M.W.L., 1996, The FAO Africover Project and a Possibility of a Unified Geodetic Datum for Africa (UGDA). Presented at the Ninth United Nations Cartographic Conference for Africa. United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. ECA/NRD/CART.9/ORG.3O Add.1, p. 8.Google Scholar
  7. Cihlar J., 2000, Land cover mapping of large areas from satellites: status and research priorities. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(6&7): 1093–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Gregorio A., 1991, Technical Report on Land Cover Mapping of Lebanon. FAO project document. Project NECP/LEB/001/SAU. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  9. Di Gregorio A., Jansen L.J.M., 1996, Africover Land Cover Classification. FAO Working Paper for the Dakar Meeting of Africover Working Group on Legend and Classification. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy, pp. 25+27 of appendices.Google Scholar
  10. Di Gregorio A., Jansen L.J.M., 1996, The Africover Land Cover Classification Scheme: A Dichotomous, Modular-Hierarchical Approach. Working Paper with the Proposal for the International Working Group Meeting, 29–31 July, Dakar.Google Scholar
  11. Ehlers M., 1995, The Promise of Remote Sensing for Land Cover Monitoring and Modeling, Joint European Conference and Exhibition on Geographical Information. The Hague, The Netherlands, 2, pp. 426–432.Google Scholar
  12. European Environmental Agency, 2002, European Topic Center-Terrestrial Environment. CORINE Land Cover Update I&CLC2000 Project. Technical Guidelines.Google Scholar
  13. European Environment Agency, 2006, The thematic accuracy of Corine Land Cover 2000 Assessment using LUCAS. EEA Technical Report No. 7/2006, ISSN 1725-2237.Google Scholar
  14. European Environment Agency, 2007, Corine Land Cover 2000 (CLC2000) 100 m - version 9/2007.Google Scholar
  15. EUROSTAT, 1999, Land Cover and Land Use Information Systems for European Union Policy Needs. Seminar Proceedings, Luxembourg. EUROSTAT, Studies and Research, Theme 5, p. 193.Google Scholar
  16. FAO, 1994, Africover. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). Project Document. FAO Remote Sensing Centre, Rome, Italy, p. 142.Google Scholar
  17. FAO, 1997, Africover Land Cover Classification, Remote Sensing Centre Series, n.70, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  18. FAO/UNEP/IAO/USAID, 2002, Proceedings of the FAO/UNEP Expert Consultation on Strategies for Global Land Cover. Mapping and Monitoring. Artimino, Florence, Italy, 6–8 May 2002.Google Scholar
  19. Feranec J., Otahel J., Pravda J., 1995, Proposal for a Methodology and Nomenclature Scale 1:50,000 CORINE Land Cover Project, Final Report, Institute of Geography, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava.Google Scholar
  20. Grossman D.H., Faber-Langendoen D., Weakley A.W., Anderson M., Bourgeron P., Crawford R., Goodin K., Landaal S., Metsler K., Patterson K.D., Pyne M., Reid M., Sneddon L., 1998, International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the Unifed States, Vol. 1, The National Vegetation Classification System: Development, Status and Application. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, USA, p. 126.Google Scholar
  21. Iliffe J., 1994, Africover - Geodesy and Map Projections. Unpublished FAO Background Paper for the Technical and Donor Consultations on the Africover Project, 4–11 July, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
  22. Kalensky S.D., 1998, Africover land cover database and map of Africa. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(3): 292–297.Google Scholar
  23. Kalensky S.D., Cumani R., 2000, Use of Advanced Geo-Information Technologies in Land Use Planning and Management. Presented at the Geomatics Conference, Montreal, Canada, p. 12.Google Scholar
  24. Kalensky S.D., Latham J.S., 1998, The Establishment of Environmental Information Systems (EIS) in developing countries. Geomatica, 52(4): 474–480.Google Scholar
  25. Lambin E.F., Baulies X., Bockstael N., Fischer G., Krug T., Leemans R., Moran E.F., Latham J.S., He C., Alinovi L., Di Gregorio A., Kalensky S.D., 2002, FAO Methodologies for Land Cover Classification and Mapping. Chapter of the book: Remote Sensing and GIS Applications for Linking People, Place and Policy, S.J. Walsh and K.A. Crews-Meyer (Eds.) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA.Google Scholar
  26. Loveland T., Yasuoka Y., Burgan B., Chen J., Defries R., Lund H.G., Lynham T., Mayaux P., Gregoire J.-M., 1998, GOLD-3: Global Observations of Forest Cover: Coarse resolution Product Design Strategy workshop report, Sioux Falls, USA, July.Google Scholar
  27. Rindfuss R.R., Sat Y., Skole D., Turner II B.L., Vogel C., 1999, Land Use Cover Change Implementation Strategy. IGBP Report N.48, IHDP Report: 10, Stockholm, International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme Secretariat.Google Scholar
  28. Palko S., St-Laurent L., Huffman T., Unrau E., 1996, The Canada Vegetation and Land Cover: A Raster and Vector Data Set for GIS Applications – Uses in Agriculture. Published in GIS Applications in Natural Resources 2. M. Heit, H.D. Parker and A. Shortreid, Eds. GIS World Inc. Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, pp. 185–191.Google Scholar
  29. Skole D.L., Salas W.A., Taylor V., 1998, GOLD-4: Global Observation of Forest Cover: Fine Resolution Data and Product Design Strategy Workshop Report, Paris, France, 23–25 September.Google Scholar
  30. Thompson M., 1996, A standard land-cover classification scheme for remote sensing applications in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 92(1): 34–42.Google Scholar
  31. UNEP 1993, Vegetation Classification. Report of the UNEP-HEM/WCMC/GCTE Preparatory Meeting, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. GEMS Report Series Publication, 19, p. 21.Google Scholar
  32. Vogelmann J.E., Sohl T.L., Campbell P.E., Shaw D.M., 1998, Regional land cover characterisation using Landsat thematic mapper data and ancillary data sources. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 51: 415–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vogelmann J. et al., 2001, Completion of the 1990 s national land cover data set for the conterminous United States from Landsat thematic mapper data and ancillary data sources. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67: 650–652.Google Scholar
  34. Young A., 1994, Towards International Classifi cation Systems for Land Use and Land Cover, UNEP/FAO Report of the Export Meeting on Harmonising Land Cover And Land Use Classifications, Geneva, 23–25 November, GEMS Report Series 25, UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, p. 45.Google Scholar
  35. Wyatt B.K. et al., 1997, Guidelines for Land Use and Land Cover Description and Classifi cation. Draft Final Report. ITE Huntingdon/ITC Enschede/WCMC Cambridge/UNDP Nairobi, p. 134.Google Scholar